romanian english

Crina-Maria STANCIU:Analiză comparativă a limitelor drepturilor de autor în spaţiul digital...

DOI: 10.47743/jss-2025-71-3-9

Facultatea de Drept, Universitatea „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Iași.

Rezumat: Textul Directivei UE 2019/790 privind drepturile de autor pe piaţa unică digitală stabilește mai multe reguli menite să protejeze drepturile de autor în sfera digitală, alături de mai multe excepţii care permit utilizarea conţinutului protejat, fără a fi nevoie de consimţământul titularului drepturilor de autor.

De un real interes pentru noi este art. 17 din Directivă, care stabilește responsabilitatea platformelor online, precum YouTube sau Facebook, pentru conţinutul încărcat de utilizatori, atunci când acest lucru ar conduce la încălcarea drepturilor de autor. Totodată, sunt stabilite anumite limite legale care permit utilizarea conţinutului, cum ar fi parodiile, criticile sau recenziile (art. 5 din Directiva 2001/29/CE).

Având în vedere cele de mai sus, ne propunem să analizăm comparativ unele dintre limitele drepturilor de autor, oglindind o posibilă versiune întâlnită în Canada sub forma conţinutului generat de utilizatori.

Întrebarea la care vom răspunde prin intermediul acestui studiu este: „Cum protejăm drepturile de autor în sfera digitală și, în special, la nivelul platformelor online utilizate pentru distribuirea conţinutului ?”.

Cuvinte-cheie: fair use, user generated content, opere derivate, limite, drept de autor.

Referințe:

Asadi, F., Digital Platforms and Intellectual Property Infringement: Exploring Legal Liability for User Generated Content in the Context of Digital Media. in Legal Studies in Digital Age 2, no.1, 2023, pp. 39–50, [Online ]https://jlsda.com/index.php/ lsda/article/view/10/9, Accessed 29.10.2025.

Bently, L., Derclaye E., Sganga C.,Peukert A.,Margoni T., Synodinou T., The Protection of Works of Applied Art under EU Copyright Law– Opinion of the European Copyright Society in Mio/konektra (CasesC-580/23 and C-795/23), in International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 56 2025, DOI:10.1007/s40319-025- 01579-4.

BusinessLawReview (UniversityofMiami), No author, The Dos and Don’ts of Social Media Trends and Music Copyright, [Online] https://business-law-review.law.miami.edu/ dos-donts-social-media-trends-music-copyright/, accessed 29.10. 2025.

Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 1994, [Online], https://supreme.justia.com/cases/ federal/us/510/569/, accessed 1.09.2025.

Dornis, T.W., GenerativeAI, Reproductions Inside the Model, and the Making Available to the Public, in International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 56, no. 5, 2025, pp. 909-938. DOI:10.1007/s40319-025-01582-9, accessed 30.10.2025.

de la Durantaye, K., Control and Compensation. A Comparative Analysis of Copyright Exceptions for Training Generative AI, in International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition La, Vol. 56, 2025, pp. 737–770, DOI:10.1007/s40319-025-01569-6, accessed 29.10.2025.

Dominte, N. R., Dreptul proprietății intelectuale, Ed. Solomon, București, 2024.

Epidemic Sound, What is the 60-second music limit on TikTok, [Online] https://help.epidemicsound.com/hc/en-us/articles/26248455901458-What-is-the-60- second-music-limit-on-TikTok, accessed 29.10.2025.

European Commission, Green Paper on Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society, EUR-Lex, [Online] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/ green-paper-on-copyright-and-related-rights-in-the-information-society.html, accessed 31.08.2025.

European Union, Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. OJ L 167 (22 June 2001), [Online] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/RO/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32001L0029, accessed 30.08.2025.

Fontana, Gino, Intellectual Property Protection in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Generative Platforms, in Journal of World Intellectual Property. Forthcoming. DOI:10.1111/jwip.12355.

Guadamuz A., The EU's Artificial Intelligence Act and Copyright, in Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 28, 2025, pp. 213–219, DOI:10.1111/jwip.12330.

Guzman, F., The Tension between Derivative Works Online Protected by Fair Use and the Takedown Provisions of the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act, in Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, Vol. 13, no.2, 2015, pp. 181–200. [Online] https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njtip/vol13/ iss2/4/.

Iaia, V., The Elephant in the Room of EU Copyright Originality: Time to Unpack and Harmonize the Essential Requirement of Copyright, in Journal of World Intellectual Property 28, 2024, pp. 471–490. DOI:10.1111/jwip.12343.

Izyumenko, E., The Freedom of Expression Contours of Copyright in the Digital Era: A European Perspective in Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 19, no.3-4, 2016, pp. 115–130. DOI:10.1111/jwip.12057.

Kim, C.E., Insta-Fringement: What is a Fair Use on Social Media?, in Journal of the Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 18, 2018, pp. 102–120. [Online] https://repository.law.uic.edu/ripl/vol18/iss1/5/.

Lennartz, J., Kraetzig, V., Forbidden Fruits? Artistic Creation in the AI Copyright War, in International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 56, 2025, pp. 241–245. DOI:10.1007/s40319-024-01551-8.

Macovei, I., Tratat de drept al proprietății intelectuale, Ed. C.H.Beck, București, 2010.

Mazzi, F., Authorship in Artificial Intelligence-Generated Works: Exploring Originality in Text Prompts and Artificial Intelligence Outputs through Philosophical Foundations of Copyright and Collage Protection. In Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 27, 2024, pp. 410–427. DOI:10.1111/jwip.12310.

Legea nr. 8/1996 privind dreptul de autor şi drepturile conexe. Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, nr.60, 26 martie 1996. [Online] https://legislatie.just.ro/public/ detaliidocument/7816.

Schafer, B., Komuves D., Zatarain J. M. N., and LaurenceDiver, A Fourth Law of Robotics? Copyright and the Law and Ethics of Machine Co-Production in Artificial Intelligence and Law, Vol. 23, no.3, 2015, pp. 217–240. DOI:10.1007/s10506-015-9169-7.

Sawyer, M.S., Filters, Fair Use, and Feedback: User Generated Content Principles and the DMCA, in Berkeley Technology Law Journal. [Online] https://ssrn.com/ abstract=1369665.

Smith, G.J.H., Internet Law and Regulation, Ed. Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2007.

Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 1984, [Online] https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/464/417/.

Thongmeensuk, S., Rethinking Copyright Exceptions in the Era of Generative AI: Balancing Innovation and Intellectual Property Protection, in Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 27, 2024, pp. 278–295. DOI:10.1111/jwip.12301.

United States, United States Code. Section107, [Online] https://www.copyright.gov/ title17/92chap1.html#107.

Wong, M.W. S., ‘Transformative’ User-Generated Content in Copyright Law: Infringing Derivative Works or Fair Use?, in Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, Vol. 11, 2009, pp. 1075–1120.


Facultatea de Drept
.

B-dul Carol I nr. 11, cod 700506, IAŞI
Secretariat cursuri IF:
+40 232 201058
+40 232 201158
Fax: +40 232 201858
Secretariat cursuri IFR:
+40 232 201272
Fax: +40 232 201872


Copyright Facultatea de Drept, IAŞI , 2026
Server-ul a generat răspunsul în 0.0794 sec.
292087348