DOI: 10.47743/jss-2025-71-3-9
Faculty of Law, "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University of Iași.
Abstract: The text of the EU Directive 2019/790 on copyright in the Digital Single Market establishes several rules intended to protect copyright in the digital sphere, along with several exceptions that allow the use of protected content, without the need for the consent of the copyright holder.
Of real interest to us is art. 17 of the Directive, which establishes the responsibility of online platforms, such as YouTube or Facebook, for content uploaded by users, when this would lead to copyright infringement. At the same time, certain legal limits are established that allow the use of content, such as parodies, criticisms or reviews (art. 5 of Directive 2001/29/EC).
Given the above, we propose to analyze in a comparative manner some limits of copyright, mirroring a possible version found in Canada in the form of User Generated Content.
The question we will answer through this study is: „How do we protect copyright in the digital sphere and, in particular, at the level of online platforms used to distribute content?".
Keywords: fair use, user generated content, transformative uses, limits, copyright.
References:
Asadi, F., Digital Platforms and Intellectual Property Infringement: Exploring Legal Liability for User Generated Content in the Context of Digital Media. in Legal Studies in Digital Age 2, no.1, 2023, pp. 39–50, [Online ]https://jlsda.com/index.php/ lsda/article/view/10/9, Accessed 29.10.2025.
Bently, L., Derclaye E., Sganga C.,Peukert A.,Margoni T., Synodinou T., The Protection of Works of Applied Art under EU Copyright Law– Opinion of the European Copyright Society in Mio/konektra (CasesC-580/23 and C-795/23), in International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 56 2025, DOI:10.1007/s40319-025- 01579-4.
BusinessLawReview (UniversityofMiami), No author, The Dos and Don’ts of Social Media Trends and Music Copyright, [Online] https://business-law-review.law.miami.edu/ dos-donts-social-media-trends-music-copyright/, accessed 29.10. 2025.
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 1994, [Online], https://supreme.justia.com/cases/ federal/us/510/569/, accessed 1.09.2025.
Dornis, T.W., GenerativeAI, Reproductions Inside the Model, and the Making Available to the Public, in International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 56, no. 5, 2025, pp. 909-938. DOI:10.1007/s40319-025-01582-9, accessed 30.10.2025.
de la Durantaye, K., Control and Compensation. A Comparative Analysis of Copyright Exceptions for Training Generative AI, in International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition La, Vol. 56, 2025, pp. 737–770, DOI:10.1007/s40319-025-01569-6, accessed 29.10.2025.
Dominte, N. R., Dreptul proprietății intelectuale, Ed. Solomon, București, 2024.
Epidemic Sound, What is the 60-second music limit on TikTok, [Online] https://help.epidemicsound.com/hc/en-us/articles/26248455901458-What-is-the-60- second-music-limit-on-TikTok, accessed 29.10.2025.
European Commission, Green Paper on Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society, EUR-Lex, [Online] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/ green-paper-on-copyright-and-related-rights-in-the-information-society.html, accessed 31.08.2025.
European Union, Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. OJ L 167 (22 June 2001), [Online] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/RO/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32001L0029, accessed 30.08.2025.
Fontana, Gino, Intellectual Property Protection in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Generative Platforms, in Journal of World Intellectual Property. Forthcoming. DOI:10.1111/jwip.12355.
Guadamuz A., The EU's Artificial Intelligence Act and Copyright, in Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 28, 2025, pp. 213–219, DOI:10.1111/jwip.12330.
Guzman, F., The Tension between Derivative Works Online Protected by Fair Use and the Takedown Provisions of the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act, in Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, Vol. 13, no.2, 2015, pp. 181–200. [Online] https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njtip/vol13/ iss2/4/.
Iaia, V., The Elephant in the Room of EU Copyright Originality: Time to Unpack and Harmonize the Essential Requirement of Copyright, in Journal of World Intellectual Property 28, 2024, pp. 471–490. DOI:10.1111/jwip.12343.
Izyumenko, E., The Freedom of Expression Contours of Copyright in the Digital Era: A European Perspective in Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 19, no.3-4, 2016, pp. 115–130. DOI:10.1111/jwip.12057.
Kim, C.E., Insta-Fringement: What is a Fair Use on Social Media?, in Journal of the Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 18, 2018, pp. 102–120. [Online] https://repository.law.uic.edu/ripl/vol18/iss1/5/.
Lennartz, J., Kraetzig, V., Forbidden Fruits? Artistic Creation in the AI Copyright War, in International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 56, 2025, pp. 241–245. DOI:10.1007/s40319-024-01551-8.
Macovei, I., Tratat de drept al proprietății intelectuale, Ed. C.H.Beck, București, 2010.
Mazzi, F., Authorship in Artificial Intelligence-Generated Works: Exploring Originality in Text Prompts and Artificial Intelligence Outputs through Philosophical Foundations of Copyright and Collage Protection. In Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 27, 2024, pp. 410–427. DOI:10.1111/jwip.12310.
Legea nr. 8/1996 privind dreptul de autor şi drepturile conexe. Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, nr.60, 26 martie 1996. [Online] https://legislatie.just.ro/public/ detaliidocument/7816.
Schafer, B., Komuves D., Zatarain J. M. N., and LaurenceDiver, A Fourth Law of Robotics? Copyright and the Law and Ethics of Machine Co-Production in Artificial Intelligence and Law, Vol. 23, no.3, 2015, pp. 217–240. DOI:10.1007/s10506-015-9169-7.
Sawyer, M.S., Filters, Fair Use, and Feedback: User Generated Content Principles and the DMCA, in Berkeley Technology Law Journal. [Online] https://ssrn.com/ abstract=1369665.
Smith, G.J.H., Internet Law and Regulation, Ed. Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2007.
Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 1984, [Online] https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/464/417/.
Thongmeensuk, S., Rethinking Copyright Exceptions in the Era of Generative AI: Balancing Innovation and Intellectual Property Protection, in Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 27, 2024, pp. 278–295. DOI:10.1111/jwip.12301.
United States, United States Code. Section107, [Online] https://www.copyright.gov/ title17/92chap1.html#107.
Wong, M.W. S., ‘Transformative’ User-Generated Content in Copyright Law: Infringing Derivative Works or Fair Use?, in Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, Vol. 11, 2009, pp. 1075–1120.