DOI: 10.47743/jss-2024-70-4-3

Rezumat: Articolul de faţă analizează evoluţia tehnicii poligraf în contextul contemporan, subliniind importanţa sa istorică și modul în care diverse metode de detectare a minciunii au influenţat dezvoltarea sa. Poligraful modern a beneficiat de descoperirile tehnologice și medicale, iar secolul XX a marcat introducerea procedurilor standardizate și validarea știinţifică a testelor. Odată cu apariţia internetului, accesul la informaţii despre poligraf și contramăsurători a forţat examinatorii să se adapteze, în timp ce digitalizarea a adus îmbunătăţiri semnificative prin utilizarea algoritmilor computerizaţi, sporind acurateţea și obiectivitatea rezultatelor. Cercetările recente explorează integrarea reţelelor neuronale și a tehnologiei de amplificare neurală pentru a perfecţiona tehnica poligraf. În ciuda provocărilor erei digitale, adaptarea constantă la noile descoperiri permite poligrafului să rămână un instrument valoros și relevant în investigarea minciunii.

Cuvinte-cheie: poligraf, minciună, tehnologie digitală, algoritmi computerizaţi, neuroștiinţe.

Referințe:

Burtt, H. E., A pneumograph for inspiration-expiration ratios. Psychological Bulletin, 15(10), 1918, pp. 325-328. DOI. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0075027.

Gordon, N., Mohamed, F., Faro, S., Platek, S., Ahmad, H., Williams, J. M., Integrated zone comparison polygraph technique accuracy with scoring algorithms. Physiology & behavior, 2006, DOI. 87. 251-4. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.046.

Gordon, N. J., Essentials of Polygraph and Polygraph Testing. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2017, pp. 2-6. DOI. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315438641.

Horvath, F., A Hundred Years of Polygraphy: Some Primary Changes and Related Issues. European Polygraph, 14(1), 2020, pp. 30-43. DOI. https://doi.org/10.2478/ ep-2020-0007.

Kircher, J. C., Raskin, D. C. Human versus computerized evaluations of polygraph data in a laboratory setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 1988, pp. 291-302. DOI. 10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.291.

Krapohl, D. J., Shaw, P. K. Fundamentals of Polygraph Practice. Academic Press. Elsevier Science, 2015, p. 1. DOI. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-19025-5.

Krapohl, D., Five Milestones in the History of the Polygraph. European Polygraph, 14(1), 2020, pp. 44-46. DOI. https://doi.org/10.2478/ep-2020-0008

Marston, W. M., Psychological Possibilities in the Deception Tests. Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, 11(4), 1921, pp. 551-570. DOI. https://doi.org/10.2307/1133465.

National Research Council, The Polygraph and Lie Detection. Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2003, pp. 33-35.

Nelson, R., Scientific Basis for Polygraph Testing. Polygraph. 44, 2015, pp. 28-61.
Nelson, R., Krapohl, D., Regular Features Practical Polygraph: Introduction to the Newly Approved Model Policy for Algorithm Use in Evidentiary Polygraph Examinations.APA Magazine, 57 (2), 2024, pp. 88-91.

Negru, A. I., Administrarea și aprecierea probelor în procesul penal. Editura Universul Juridic,București, 2022, p.28.

Olsen, D., Harris, J., Capps, M., and Ansley, N. Computerized Polygraph Scoring System,ASTM International. J. Forensic Sci, 42(1), 1997, pp. 61-71. DOI. https://doi.org/ 10.1520/JFS14068J.

Rad, D., Paraschiv, N., Kiss, C., Neural Network Applications in Polygraph Scoring-A ScopingReview. Information, 2023, DOI. 14. 564. 10.3390/info14100564.

Rad, D., Paraschiv, N., Kiss, C., Balas, V., Barna, C., Physiological Reactions Profiling in Polygraph Testing: Insights from Fuzzy C-Means Clustering Analysis. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica. 21, 2024, pp. 365-377. DOI. 10.12700/APH.21.10.2024.10.23. Raskin, D., Kircher, J., Honts, C., Computerized Polygraph Interpretations and Detection of Physical Countermeasures, 2019, DOI. 10.4324/9780429036590-20.

Summers, W. G., A recording psychogalvanometer. Bulletin of the American Association of Jesuit Scientists, 14(2), 1936, pp. 50-56. apud. Widacki, J., First Attempts at Practical Use of Instrumental Lie Detection, European Polygraph 4 (50), 2019, pp. 203-222. Synnott, J., Dietzel, D., Ioannou, M., A review of the polygraph: history, methodology and current status, Crime Psychology Review, 1:1, 2015, pp. 59-83, DOI.10.1080/23744006.2015.1060080.

Widacki, J., The First Polygraph? European Polygraph 3 (37), 2016, pp. 111-116.

Widacki, J., First Attempts at Practical Use of Instrumental Lie Detection. European Polygraph 4 (50), 2019, pp. 203-222.

Xiaotan, L., Research on the Polygraph: the CMOS Neural Amplifier. Highlights in Science,

Engineering and Technology. 32, 2023, pp. 128-134. DOI. 10.54097/hset.v32i.4982.