Abstract: Current various manifestations and statements, coming either from simple individuals or from people holding official positions, spread very quickly around the globe and bring into discussion essential issues related to the exercise of freedom of expression and the possibility of interference on abusive speech that is excluded from the protection framework and internationally established standards. The aim of the paper is to explore the regulatory framework for the protection of freedom of expression in various systems and mechanisms established to guarantee fundamental rights (global and regional) and to emphasize the relative nature of this right. In this respect, both common features common of the legal instruments of protection and differences between the scope and special issues will be identified, taking into consideration the specific circumstances of a particular legal area. The purpose of the paper is not to provide a comprehensive analysis of the issues related to the implementation of the elements of freedom of expression, after which general lines and principles of protection and limitation are drawn.
Key-words: scope; principles of application; restrictions; jurisdiction
DOI: http://doi.org/10.47743/jss-2021-67-1-12
References
African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights, Declaration of Principles on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information in Africa 2019
African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Lohé Issa Konaté v. The Republic of Burkina Faso, App. No. 004/2013
Arab Charter on Human Rights, Cairo, 15 September 1994
Carta africană a drepturilor omului și popoarelor, 26 iunie 1981
CEDO, Morar c. României, Hotărârea din 7 iulie 2015
CEDO, Hotărârea din 24 mai 1988, în cauza Müller c. Elveției
CEDO, Hotărârea din 20 noiembrie 1989, Markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann c. Germaniei
CEDO, Handyside c. Regatului Unit, Hotărârea din 7 decembrie 1976
CEDO, decizia de inadmisibilitate din 24 iunie 2003, în cauza Garaudy c. Franței
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Views adopted by the Committee under article 5 of the Optional Protocol, Concerning communication No. 11/2013, 25 May 2016, Gemma Beasley/Australia
Comentariul general nr. 10 asupra libertății de exprimare: art. (19) – General Comment No. 10: freedom of expression (Art. 19), adoptat la 29 iunie 1983
Commission IADH, Rodolfo Robles Espinoza e Hijos c. Pérou, 23 februarie 1999, Rapport no. 20/99, Rapport annuel 1999
Cour IADH, Ricardo Canese c. Paraguay, 31 august 2004, Série C no. 111
Cour IADH, Caso Herrera Ulloa (La Nación) c. Costa Rica, 2 iulie 2004, Série C no. 107
Cour IADH, Ivcher Bronstein c. Pérou, 6 februarie 2001, Arrêt sur le fond, Série C no. 74
Cour IADH, Avis consultatif, La Colegiación Obligatoria de Periodistas, 13 noiembrie 1985, OC-5/85, Série A no. 5
Cour IADH, Blake c. Guatemala, 24 ianuarie 1998, Arrêt sur le fond, Série C no. 36
Cour IADH, Avis consultatif, La Colegación Obligatoria de Periodistas, 13 November 1985, OC‑5/85, Série A no. 5
Cour IADH, Ricardo Canese c. Paraguay, 31 August 2004, Série C no. 111
Cour IADH, Caso Palamara Iribarne c. Chili, 22 November 2005, Série C no. 135
Declaration on Media Freedom in the Arab World, Casablanca 3 May 2016
East African Court of Justice, Mseto v. Attorney General, Case Number 7 of 2016, June 21 2018
ECHR, Lingens c. Austria, Application No. 9815/82, 8 July, 1986
Heyman, St.J., Righting the Balance: An Inquiry into the Foundations and Limits of Freedom of Expression, Boston University Law Review, vol. 78, 1998
Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 11: Prohibition of propaganda for war and inciting national, racial or religious hatrred (Art. 20), adoptat la 29 iulie 1983
Human Rights Committee, General comment No. 34. Article 19: Freedoms of opinion and expression (CCPR/C/GC/34), 102nd session, Geneva, 11-29 iulie 2011
Human Rights Committee, Communication No. 2016/2010, Views adopted by the Committee at its 115th session (19 October‑6 November 2015), Leonid Sudalenko/Belarus
Human Rights Committee, Views adopted by the Committee under article 5 (4) of the Optional Protocol, concerning communication No. 2158/2012, Andrei Sviridov/Kazakhstan, 13 July 2017
Human Rights Committee, Views adopted by the Committee under article 5 (4) of the Optional Protocol, Concerning communication No. 2092/2011, Sergei Androsenko/Belarus
Human Rights Committee, Views adopted by the Committee under article 5(4) of the Optional Protocol, Concerning communication No. 2205/2012, Yashar Agazade and Rasul Jafarov/Azerbaijan
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, U.N. G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI), December 1966, 21 U.N.GAOR Supp. (No. 16), U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 999 U.N.T.S. 171
Land, M., Toward an International Law of the Internet, în Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 54, nr. 2/2013
Moldovan, C. Drept internațional public. Instituții și principii fundamentale, ediția a II-a, Editura Universul Juridic, București, 2019
Moldovan, C., Libertatea de exprimare. Garanții și responsabilități. Ghid de standarde internaționale și europene, Editura Hamangiu, București, 2018.
Moldovan, C., Libertatea de exprimare. Principii, Restricții. Jurisprudență, Editura CH Beck, București, 2012
Moldovan, C., Considerații în legătură cu reglementarea internațională a „discursului urii” ca limită a libertății de exprimare, în Dreptul nr. 1/2015
Schauer, Fr., Freedom of Expression Adjudication in Europe and America: A Case Study in Comparative Constitutional Architecture, Comparative Constitutional Architecture, Harvard University, John. F. Kennedy Shool of Government, Faculty Research Working Papers Series, February 2005
Schmidt, M.G.; Vojtovic, R.L.; Holocaust Denial and Freedom of Expression, în The Jurisprudence of Human Rights Law: A Comparative Interpretative Approach, Th.S. Orlin, A. Rosas, M. Scheinin (ed.), Institute for Human Rights, Ǻbo Akademi University, Turku/Ǻbo, 2000
The Statute of the Arab Court of Human Rights, 2014
UNESCO, World trends in freedom of expression and media development: regional overview of Asia Pacific, 2017/2018
Universal Declaration on Human Rights, December 1948, G. A. Res. 217 A (III), U.N. Doc. A/810