Abstract: The study presents a comparative analysis of regulatory responses to Uber's ride‑sharing services in Romania, Finland, and the Czech Republic, following the ECJ decision C‑434/15. It explores the nuanced approaches undertaken by each country, from Romania's strict regulations to Finland's more liberalized stance, and the Czech Republic's intermediary model. Throughout the analysis, the study discusses the concept of influence, particularly the ECJ's role in shaping these national regulatory frameworks. Despite differences, all responses aim to strike a balance between fostering innovation and addressing concerns related to fair competition and consumer rights. This study offers insights into the diverse regulatory landscapes within the EU and their implications for the future of ride‑sharing platforms like Uber.
Keywords: ride‑sharing platforms, collaborative economy, transport service, information society service.
References:
Adam, D., et al., Digitalisation and working life: lessons from the Uber cases around Europe, [Online] https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/2016/digitalisation-and-working-life-lessons-uber-cases-around-europe
Codagnone, C., Martens, B., Scoping the Sharing Economy: Origins, Definitions, Impact and Regulatory Issues în JRC Technical Reports, Institute For Prospective Technological Studies Digital Economy Working Paper 2016/01, http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2783662.
Dudley, G., Banister, D., Schwane, T., The Rise of Uber and Regulating the Disruptive Innovator în The Political Quarterly, 88, pp. 492‑499, 2017, https://doi.org/ 10.1111/1467‑923X.12373.
Eurofound (2022), Amendment of the Road Transport Act in Czechia (Initiative), Record number 4296, Platform Economy Database, [Online] https://apps.eurofound.europa.eu/platformeconomydb/amendment-of-the-road-transport-act-in-czechia-110059
Eurofound (2022), Tax memorandum signed by Uber in Czechia (Initiative), Record number 4295, Platform Economy Database, [Online]
Hacker, P., UberPop, UberBlack, and the regulation of digital platforms after the Asociación Profesional Elite Taxi, în European Review of Contract Law (ERCL), ISSN 1614‑9939, De Gruyter, Berlin, Vol. 14, Iss. 1/2018, pp. 80‑96, https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl‑2018‑1005
Kanger, K., Kivimaa, P., The emergence and consolidation of mobility‑as‑a‑service in Finland, [Online]
March, J. G., An introduction to the theory and measurement of influence, în American Political Science Review, vol. 49, n. 2/1955, pp: 431–451, https://doi.org/10.2307/1951813.
Martinsen, D. S Judicial Influence on Policy Outputs? The Political Constraints of Legal Integration in the European Union, în Comparative Political Studies, 48(12), 1612‑1660, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015592591.
Martinsen, D. S. An Ever More Powerful Court? The Political Constraints of Legal Integration in the European Union, Editura Oxford University Press, 2015.
Meelen, T., Frenken, K., Stop Saying Uber Is Part Of The Sharing Economy, [Online]
Novoa, J., Uber is off to a good start in Spain: Madrid and Barcelona among its fastest growing cities, [Online]
OECD, Taxi, ride‑sourcing and ride‑sharing services ‑ Note by Finland,
Schor, J., Debating the Sharing Economy: Great Transformation Initiative, [Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 4(3), pp. 7–22.
Ungureanu, C.T., Drept internaţional privat european în raporturi de comerţ internaţional, Editura Hamangiu, Bucureşti, 2021.
2024_3_3.pdf