Rezumat: Scopul prezentului articol este să indice şi evalueze mecanismul de devenire metodologică a instituţiei conflictului de legi. În cadrul acestui mecanism, conflictul de legi nu mai oscilează ferm între metodologia multilateralismului şi metodologia unilateralismului. Mecanismul în discuţie sugerează că multilateralismul contemporan supravieţuieşte graţie unilateralismului însuşi. Aceeaşi idee se „mişcă” în‑între ordinile juridice naţionale, ordinea juridică internaţională şi ordinea de drept cvasi‑federal a Uniunii Europene, pe de o parte, pune în mişcare conceptul de „norme de aplicare necesară”, pe de altă parte. Concluzia noastră conduce la ideea potrivit căreia doctrinarii contemporani au dobândit identităţi în mişcare. Asemenea identităţi le permit să conceptualizeze, cu adevărat, în mişcare.
Cuvinte‑cheie: instituţia conflictului de legi, drept internaţional, dreptul Uniunii Europene, multilateralism, unilateralism
Referințe:
Allen S., Costelloe D., Fitzmaurice M., Craigl P., Guntrip E. (coord.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisdiction in International Law, Oxford University Press, 2019, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788119238.
Ancel B., Éléménts d’histoire du droit international privé, Éditions Panthéon‑Assas, Paris, 2017.
Audit M., Stephan W. Schill S. W. (coord.), Transnational Law of Public Contracts, Bruylant, Bruxelles, 2016.
Banu R., Conflicting Justice in Conflict of Laws, în Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 53, nr. 2/2020, pp: 461-523.
Basedow J., EU Private Law. Anatomy of a Growing Legal Order, Intersentia, Cambridge – Antwerp – Chicago, 2021.
Berman P. S. (coord.),, The Oxford Handbook of Global Legal Pluralism, Oxford University Press, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197516744.001.0001.
Berman P. S., Conflict of Laws, Globalization and Cosmopolitan Pluralism, Wayne Law Review, vol. 51, nr. 3/2015.
Bobei R. B., Instituţia conflictului de legi în Uniunea Europeană. Câteva consideraţii, în Dreptul, nr. 1/2023, pp. 9‑31.
Bobei R. B., Curtoazia. Concept de drept transnaţional, în Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iaşi, Tomul LXIX Ştiinţe Juridice, nr. I/2023, pp. 39‑65, DOI: http://doi.org/10.47743/jss‑2023‑69‑1‑3.
Bobei R. B., Teoria conflictului de jurisdicţii. O propunere, în Dreptul nr. 2/2023, pp. 75‑95.
Bobei R. B., Două situaţii transnaţionale şi o teorie, în Dreptul, nr. 1/2022, pp. 64‑90.
Bobei R. B., Foste adevăruri transnaţionale viitoare, în Studia Universitatis Babeş‑Bolyai Iurisprudentia, vol. 67, nr. 4/2022, pp. 81‑136, DOI: 10.24193/SUBBiur.67(2022).4.3.
Bobei R. B., Teoria conflictului de legi civile, Editura Universul Juridic, Bucureşti, 2020.
Beaumont P., Holliday J. (coord.), A Guide to Global Private International Law, Studies in Private International Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2022.
Bogdan M., Pertegás Sender M., Concise Introduction to EU Private International Law, ed. a IV‑a, Europa Law Publishing, Amsterdam, 2019.
Buxbaum H. L., Graff T. F. (coord.), Extraterritoriality/L’extraterritorialité, The Hague Academy of International Law, Centre for Studies and Research in International Law and International Relations Series, vol. 23/2022.
Callies G. P., Renner M. (coord), Rome Regulations. Commentary, Third Edition, Wolters Kluwer, Kluwer Law International BV, 2020.
Cuniberti G., Conflict of Laws. A Comparative Approach. Text and Cases, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (UK) – Northampton, MA (USA), 2022.
Duţu M., Constituţionalizarea dreptului mediului în România. Evoluţia reglementărilor, contribuţia jurisprudenţei şi reacţia doctrinei, în Dreptul, nr. 3/2022, pp. 80‑111.
Fallon M., Lagarde P., Poillot‑Peruzzetto S. (coord.), Quelle architecture pour un code européen de droit international privé?, P.I.E. Peter Lang D.A., Éditions Scientifiques internationales, Bruxelles, 2011.
Ferrari F. (coord.), Concise Commentary on the Rome I Regulation, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 2015, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1017/ 9781108596633.
Ferrari F., Fernández Arroyo D.P. (coord.), Private International Law. Contemporary Challenges and Continuing Relevance, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (UK), Northampton(MA), USA, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906905.
Gottschalk E., Michaels R., Rühl G., von Hein J.(coord.), Conflict of Laws in a Globalized World, Cambridge University Press, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511511196.
Hatzimihail N. E., Preclassical Conflict of Laws, Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law, Cambridge University Press, 2021 https://doi.org/ 10.1017/9781139016674.
Heymann J., Le droit international privé à l’épreuve du fédéralisme européen, Economica, Paris, 2010.
von Hein J., Kieninger E. V., Rühl G. (coord.), How European is European Private International Law? Souces, Court Practice, Academic Discourse, Intersentia, Cambridge, 2019.
Hohmann J., Joyce D. (coord.), International Law’s objects: Emergence, Encounter and Erasure through Object and Image, Oxford University Press, 2018.
Joerges C., Petersmann E.‑U. (eds.), Constitutionalism: Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Governance, Hart Publishing, Portland, 2011.
Kegel G., Story and Savigny, The American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 37, nr. 1/1989, pp. 39‑66.
Koskenniemi M., Fragmentation of International Law: difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law. Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, United Nations, A/CN.4/L.702, 2006.
Krisch N. (coord.), Entangled Legalities Beyond the State, Cambridge University Press, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914642.
Lehmann M., Regulation, Global Governance and Private International Law: Squaring the Triangle, în Journal of Private International Law, vol. 16/2020, pp. 1‑30, https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2020.1744255.
Lowenfeld A. F., International Economic Law, Second Edition, International Law Economic Law Series, Oxford University Press, 2008, 2011.
Michaels R., Towards a Private International Law for Regulatory Conflicts, în Japanese Yearbook of International Law, vol. 59/2017, pp. 175‑201.
Michaels R., Private Lawyer in Disguise? On the Absence of Private Law and Private International Law in Martti Koskenniemi’s Work, Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, vol.27, nr. 2/2013, pp. 499‑521.
Michaels R., Public and Private International Law: German Views on Global Issues, în Journal of Private International Law, nr. 4/2008, pp. 121‑138.
Monaco R., Le rapprochement des législations nationales dans le cadre du marché commun, în Annuaire français de droit international, vol. 3/1957, pp. 558‑568.
Muir Watt H., Discours sur les méthodes du droit international privé(des formes juridiques de l’inter‑altérité). Cours général de droit international privé, Academia de Drept Internaţional de la Haga, Brill‑Nijhoff, 2019.
Muir Watt H., Conflicts of laws Unbounded: The Case for a Legal Pluralist Revival, Transnational Legal Theory, vol. 7, nr. 3/2016, pp. 313‑353,https://doi.org/ 10.1080/20414005.2016.1212585.
Muir Watt H., Bíziková L., Brandão de Oliveira A., Fernández Arroyo D. P. (coord.), Global Private International Law. Adjudication without Frontiers, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham(UK) – Northampton, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788119238.
Neuhaus P. H., Savigny und die Rechtsfindung aus der Natur des Sache, Rabel Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, vol. 15, nr. 3‑4/1949, pp. 364‑381.
Prosser W. L., Interstate Publication, Michigan Law Review, vol. 51, nr. 7/1953, pp. 959‑1000.
Rasmussen‑Bonne H.‑E., Freer R., Luke W., Weinauer W.(coord.), Balancing of Interests: Liber Amicorum Peter Hay Zum 70.Geburtstag, Verlag Recht und Witschaft GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, 2005.
Riles A., Cultural Conflicts, Law and Contemporary Problems, vol. 71, nr. 3/2008, pp. 273‑308.
Rühl G., von Hein J., Towards a European Code on Private International Law?, în Rabels Zeitschrift für Ausländishes und Internationales Privatrecht, vol. 79, nr. 4/2015, pp. 701‑751, DOI: 10.1628/003372515X14373846829991.
von Savigny F. K., A Treatise on The Conflict of Laws and The Limits of Their Operation in Respect of Place and Time, T&T Clark, Law Publishers, London: Stevens & Sons, 1880.
Symeonides S., Private International Law: Idealism, Pragmatism, Eclecticism: General Course on Private International Law (Hague Collected Courses), vol. 384, Recueil des cours, Academia de Drept Internaţional de la Haga, Brill Nijhoff, 2017, pp. 9‑385.
Snyder F., Lu Y. (coord.), The Future of Transnational Law. UE, USA, China and the BRICS/L’avenir du droit transnational. UE, USA, Chine et les BRICS, Bruylant, 2015, Bruylant.
Teubner G. (trad. Gareth Norbury) (2012), Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism in Globalization, Oxford University Press.
Vagts D. F., Dodge W. S., Buxbaum H. L., Koh H. H., Transnational Business Problems, ed. a VI‑a, 2019, Foundation Press/West Academic.
Yntema H. E., The Objectives of Private International Law, The Canadian Bar Review, vol. 35, nr. 6/1957, pp. 721‑742.
Zumbansen P. (coord.), The Many Lives of Transnational Law. Critical Engagements with Jessup’s Bold Proposal, Cambridge University Press, 2020, https://doi.org/ 10.1017/9781108780582.