Abstract: This presentation aims to explore the intricate balance between harnessing the potential of AI for societal advancement and addressing the ethical implications of data utilization. Nowadays data centers where user information is stocked must follow a very specific set of laws. This empowers researchers in the field of AI to train their models without feeding them with decrypted user data. But who decides how to use the data? Currently most companies that gather information from their customers must follow a set of directives from the EU Commission. Therefore, the evolution of the artificial intelligence would not mean the invasion of personal privacy. In this paper we hope to increase the necessity of treating data as legal object to which will apply reinterpreted rules, according to the flow of AI development. We will focus more on the content of data and to the moment when the data might be stored and transferred because of its increasing value (economic value). Data is an asset who can be traded. Also, data can help to create a personality of the users (this is why the value of data can increase). Another question we will try to answer concerns the concept of „digital estate” and postmortem data. After a person dies what will happen with its digital form like digital money (bitcoin or assets won in a game), with the Facebook account, Google account etc.? Data from people will make artificial people who will survive the natural death?
Keywords: AI, machine learning, acts inter vivos, acts mortis causa, property.
References
Abadi M., Chu A., Goodfellow I., McMahan H. B., Mironov I., Talwar K., Zhang L. (2016). Deep Learning with Differential Privacy.
Backhoum M., B. C. Gallego, M. O. Mackenrodt et alii, Personal Data in Competition, Consumer Protection and Intellectual Property Law. Toward a Holistic Approach?, in MPI Studies on Tellectual Property and Competition Law 28, Springer, Berlin, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57646-5.
Boroi G., C.A. Anghelescu, B. Nazat, Curs de drept civil. Drepturile reale principale, Ed. Hamangiu, București, 2013, pp. 16-17.
Chawla N. V., Bowyer K. W., Hall L. O., Kegelmeyer W. P. (2002). SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique.
Custers B., Alan M. Sears, F. Dechesne et alii, EU Personal Data Protection in Policy and Practice, in S. van der Holf, et. alii., Information Technology and Law Series, vol. 29, Ed. T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, Haga, 2019, pp. 153-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-282-8.
Fadaee M., Bisazza A., Monz C. (2017). Data Augmentation for Low-Resource Neural Machine Translation.
Franceschi A. de, European Contract Law and The Digital Single Market. The Implications of the Digital Revolution, Ed. Intersentia, Cambridge, 2016.
Kudo T., Richardson J. (2018). SentencePiece: A Simple and Language Independent Subword Tokenizer and Detokenizer for Neural Text Processing.
McMahan B., Moore E., Ramage D., Hampson S., Arcas B. A. (2017). Communication-efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data.
Mikolov T., Chen K., Corrado G., Dean J. (2013). Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space.
Miyato T., Dai A. M., Goodfellow I. (2017). Adversarial Training Methods for Semi-Supervised Text Classification.
Momberg R., Standard Terms and Transparency in Online Contracts, in loc. cit., A. de Franceschi, European Contract Law and The Digital Single Market. The Implications of the Digital Revolution, Ed. Intersentia, Cambridge, 2016.
Naef T., Data Protection without Data Protectionism. The Right to Protection of Personal Data and Data Transfers in EU Law and International Trade Law, in loc. cit., Marc Bungenberg, Christoph Herrmann, Markus Krajewski, et. alii., EYIELMonographs-StudiesinEuropeanandInternationalEconomicLaw, Vol. 28, Springer, 2021, p. 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57646-5.
Radford A., Wu J., Child R., Luan D., Amodei D., Sutskever I. (2019). Language Models are Unsupervised Multitask Learners.
Rajaraman A., Ullman J. D. (2011). Mining of Massive Datasets.
Sennrich, R., Haddow, B., & Birch, A. (2016). Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units.
Twigg-Flesner C., Disruptive Technology – Disrupted Law? How The Digital Revolution affects (Contract) Law in loc. cit., A. de Franceschi, European Contract Law and The Digital Single Market. The Implications of the Digital Revolution, Ed. Intersentia, Cambridge, 2016.
Warren S.D., L. D. Brandeis, The Right to Privacy, in Harvard Law Review, Vol. IV, decembrie 1890, [Online]
Zech H., Data as Tradeable Commodity, in loc. cit., A. de Franceschi, European Contract Law and The Digital Single Market. The Implications of the Digital Revolution, Ed. Intersentia, Cambridge, 2016.
2.7.pdf