romanian english

Ancuța Elena Franț: The role of multiple perspectives in forensic science

DOI: http://doi.org/10.47743/jss-2023-69-1-15

Abstract: Forensic science is a field in which, par excellence, information from multiple fields is combined, in order to get a picture as close as possible to the objective truth. These fields (Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Informatics etc.) are, from the point of view of their object of study, far from the legal field, but they prove to be essential for the correct resolution of various criminal cases, (and not only criminal cases). When the analyses from different specialized fields, are correctly carried out, it is difficult to fight against their conclusions. But, always, the evidence must be corroborated, and the conclusion of an expert must be critically examined, regardless of the degree of specialization of the field and the reputation of the expert. In other words, in forensics it is absolutely necessary to have a plurality of perspectives, at least in a potential state, this idea also being expressed in the theory of forensic tactics. The reality confirms the fact that, despite some apparently indubitable first results, further research can disprove the initial hypotheses. Eloquent in this regard are the cases of Stallings and Fairchild, where thorough investigations in medicine, chemistry and biology led to the disproving of the initial conclusions, which seemed beyond any doubt.

Keywords: forensics, expertise, evaluation of the evidence, judicial error

References:

Breitenbach A., Choi Y., Pluralism and the Unity of Science, în The Monist, Vol. 100, nr. 3/2017, Oxford University Press, Laws of Nature: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives, pp. 391-405, DOI: 10.1093/monist/onx017, [Online].

Cartwright N., The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.

Cat J., The Unity of Science, în Zalta E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition), [Online].

Cummings M. R., Human Heredity: Principles and Issues, Cengage Learning, Boston, 2014

Darby A., The Case of Lydia Fairchild and Her Chimerism (2002), Embryo Project Encyclopedia, 2021, [Online].

Dupret B., What is plural in the law? A praxiological answer, Égypte/Monde arabe, No. 1/2005, DOI: 10.4000/ema.1869, [Online].

Fodor J. A., Special Sciences (Or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis), Synthese, Vol. 28, nr. 2/1974, pp. 97-115, [Online]

Griffiths J., What is Legal Pluralism?, în The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, Vol. 18, nr. 24/1986, pp. 1-55, DOI:10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387, [Online].

Harding S., Objectivity and Diversity: Another Logic of Scientific Research, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2015.

Juan S., Justice fails as illness mistaken for abuse, The Sydney Morning Herald, 1992, [Online].

Kellert S. H., Longino H. E., Waters C. K. (eds.), Scientific Pluralism, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2006.

Lemons K., Sharia Courts and Muslim Personal Law in India: Intersecting Legal Regimes, în Law & Society Review, Vol. 52, nr. 3/2018, pp. 603–629, [Online]

Ludwig D., Ruphy S., Scientific Pluralism, în Zalta E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2021,[Online].

Madan K., Natural human chimeras: A review, în European Journal of Medical Genetics, Vol. 63, nr. 9/2020, DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2020.103971, [Online].

Moore S. F., Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study, în Law & Society Review, Vol. 7, Nr. 4/1973, pp. 719-746, DOI: 10.2307/3052967, [Online].

Passmore J., Logical Positivism, în Edwards P. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 5, pp. 52-57, Macmillan, New York, 1967.

Perry M. S., Patricia Stallings: Other Female Exoneration Cases with False Forensics, The National Registry of Exonerations, [Online].

Reisch G. A., Planning science: Otto Neurath and the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, în The British Journal for the History of Science, Vol. 27, nr. 2/1994, pp. 153-175, DOI: 10.1017/S0007087400031873, [Online].

Ruphy S., Scientific Pluralism Reconsidered: A New Approach to the (Dis)Unity of Science, University of Pittsburgh Press, 2016, DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1mtz6n9, [Online].

Suppes P., The Plurality of Science, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2/1978, The University of Chicago Press, pp. 3-16, [Online].

Tamanaha B. Z., Realistic Socio-Legal Theory: Pragmatism and A Social Theory of Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997.

Uebel T., Vienna Circle, în Zalta E. N., Nodelman U. (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2022, [Online].

*** Dicționarul explicativ al limbii române (ed. a II-a), Academia Română, Institutul de Lingvistică, Editura Univers Enciclopedic Gold, 2009.


Faculty of Law
.

B-dul Carol I nr. 11, cod 700506, IAŞI
Secretariat full-time learning:
+40 232 201058
+40 232 201158
Fax: +40 232 201858
Secretariat distance learning:
+40 232 201272
Fax: +40 232 201872


Copyright Faculty of Law, IAŞI , 2024
The server generated the answer in 0.0868 sec.
292087348