romanian english

Natalia Janu: Conceptual approaches regarding the objective side of the intentional insolvency offence

DOI: http://doi.org/10.47743/jss-2022-68-3-16

Abstract: According to statistical data, the number of entities that declared insolvency in the Republic of Moldova has increased significantly. Thus, if, in 2016, 673 economic agents were declared insolvent, then only in the first quarter of 2022 their number stood at 2968[1]. In all countries of the world, no matter the level and degree of development of their economy, there is such a phenomenon as insolvency. It is obvious that a natural or legal person could become insolvent because of excess debt or lack of liquidity. In other cases, however, it is found that insolvency occurs because entrepreneurs are not able to manage their business, or they intentionally, through illicit actions, cause the company's poor economic condition. Therefore, the economic and financial difficulties of an enterprise may have the "domino" negative effect of attracting the financial collapse of business partners[2]. We consider that the legislation of the Republic of Moldova provides sufficient instruments for the authorized administrator and the State Tax Service to have the possibility, together with the insolvency process, to identify offenses committed by the debtor even after the insolvency proceedings have been initiated. At the same time, we can assume that the detection of the insolvency offense in the Republic of Moldova is a rare phenomenon, because we are confronted with the problem of lack of professional training and specialization in the given field of the criminal investigation bodies, the competence in examining these crimes is assigned to the general organs of Ministry of Internal Affairs, according to art. 266 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Moldova. However, the offense of insolvency (fictitious and intentional), as an economic crime, requires extensive knowledge of the financial and accounting field, civil law, insolvency, etc., for the instrumental provision of complex strategic investigations following the experience of the European Union. It is therefore important that criminal investigation structures investigating economic offenses in general and insolvency offenses in particular should have a high return through full use of institutional and professional capacities

Keywords: trial, insolvency, entrepreneur, punishment, economic agent, property, regulation, social danger, purpose of acquisition, attributions, legal assessment, crime, prophylaxis

References

Floroiu M., Otovescu C., „Consideraţii privind falimentul internaţional. Moratoriul şi concordatul la nivel European” în Revista de Ştiinţe Juridice, nr. 1‑2/2005, pp. 209‑213

Piterschi E., „Examinarea laturii obiective a infracţiunii de falsificare a probelor într‑un proces penal în corespundere cu prevederile Codului Penal al Republicii Moldova” în volumul Conferinţei ştiinţifice internaţionale „Teoria şi practica administrării publice”, Chişinău, 2020, p. 256

Ulianovshi X., Sîli V., „Unele aspecte ale laturii obiective a infracţiunii cu caracter terorist” în Studii juridice universitare, nr. 1‑2/2018

Stati V., „Infracţiunile legate de insolvabilitate: implicaţiile adoptării Legii insolvabilităţii”, nr. 149/2012, în Revistă Ştiinţifică a Universităţii de Stat din Moldova, Tom 63, nr. 3/2013

Большой юридический словарь. / Под редакцией Сухарева А. Я., Зорькина В. Д., Крутских В. Е. Изд. ИНФРА‑М. М., 1999

Гаухман Л. Д., Максимов С. В. Преступления в сфере экономической деятельности. / Учебно‑консультационный Центр ЮрИнфоР. М., 1998

Игошин А. В. Уголовно‑правовые проблемы квалификации преступлений, связанных с банкротством. Автореферат диссертации кандидата юридических наук. Екатеринбург, 2004

Клепицкий И. А. Банкротство как преступление в современном уголовном праве. // Государство и право, №11/1997

Кондрашина И. А. Ответственность за преднамеренное и фиктивное банкротство по уголовному законодательству России и зарубежных стран. Диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата юридических наук. Казань, 2006

Можайская Л. Какие действия свидетельствуют о преднамеренном банкротстве? // Российская юстиция, №6/2001

Талан М. В. Преступления в cфере экономической деятельности. Казань, 1997

Тимербулатов А. Х. Защита прав кредиторов в уголовном законодательстве Австрии, ФРГ и Швейцарии. Государство и Право, №3/1994, с. 95

Уголовное право. Особенная часть: Учебник. / Под pед. А. И. Рарога. Изд. Юристъ. М., 2001.

Яни П. С. Криминальное банкротство. Статья вторая. Банкротство преднамеренное и фиктивное. / Законодательство. №3/2000

Яни П. С. Уголовно‑правовые средства противодействия криминальному переделу собственности. // Закон, №8/2003


Faculty of Law
.

B-dul Carol I nr. 11, cod 700506, IAŞI
Secretariat full-time learning:
+40 232 201058
+40 232 201158
Fax: +40 232 201858
Secretariat distance learning:
+40 232 201272
Fax: +40 232 201872


Copyright Faculty of Law, IAŞI , 2024
The server generated the answer in 0.0750 sec.
292087348