DOI: http://doi.org/10.47743/jss-2023-69-1-3

Rezumat: Principiul ţării de origine (country of origin principle) este susceptibil de contemplare în lumina dezbaterilor doctrinare referitoare la ascensiunea sau eşecul instituţiei conflictului de legi. Acest articol este o invitaţie lansată doctrinarilor să evalueze noţiunea de „curtoazie” (comity) ca fiind premisa autentică a principiului recunoaşterii reciproce. Sus-menţionata noţiune ne aminteşte tuturor faptul că dreptul internaţional şi conflictul de legi sunt instrumente-gemene; acestea din urmă sunt proiectate conceptual să gestioneze realităţile transnaţionale de astăzi. Statele-naţiune, organizaţiile regionale de integrare economică, organizaţiile internaţionale, actorii privaţi învaţă, din nou, modalitatea de exersare a noţiunii de „curtoazie” (comity).

Cuvinte-cheie: principiul ţării de origine, conflict de legi, curtoazie, drept transnaţional, drept internaţional

Referinţe:

Abou-Nigm V.R., Taquela M.B.N. (eds.) (2019), Diversity and Intergration in Private International Law, Edinburgh University Press.

Basedow J. (2021), EU Private Law. Anatomy of a Growing Legal Order, Intersentia, Cambridge – Antwerp-Chicago.

Beale H. (1914), Bartolus on the Conflict of Laws (traducere), Harvard University Press, London: Humphrey Milford, Oxford University Press.

Berman P.S. (ed.) (2020), The Oxford Handbook of Global Legal Pluralism, Oxford University Press

Berman H.J. (1994), World Law, Fordham International Law Journal, vol.18, nr. 5, p. 1617-1622.

Bobei R. B. (2022), Spaţii transnaţionale trecute şi prezente, Revista Dreptul, nr. 3, p.27-48.

Bobei R.B. (2022), No More Social Distance between International Law and Conflict of Laws, în Yearbook of Private International Law, vol. XXII(2020/2021), pp. 35-63.

Bobei R.B. (2021), Dreptul transnaţional şi comerţul: posibilă introducere, Revista Română de Drept al Afacerilor, nr. 1, p. 71-99.

Bobei R.B.(2021), Conştientizarea dreptului transnaţional în acţiune, Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Jurisprudenţa, nr. 3, p. 98-132. DOI: 10.24193/subbiur.66(2021).3.4.

Bobei R.B. (2020), Teoria conflictului de legi civile, Editura Universul Juridic, Bucureşti.

Bobei R.B. (2020), Abordare preliminară asupra înţelesuri ale noţiunii de „drept transnaţional”, Revista Română de Drept Internaţional, 23 (ianuarie – iunie 2020), p.7-45.

Bobei R.B. (2019), Curs de drept internaţional cu privire numai asupra comerţului, editura C.H. Beck, Bucureşti.

Bogdan M., Sender M.P. (2019), Concise Introduction to EU Private International Law, Ediţia a 4-a, Europa Law Publishing, Amsterdam.

Childress III, D.E., Ramsey M.D., Whytock C.A. (2021), Transnational Law and Practice, ediţia a II-a, Wolters Kluwer, New York.

Childress III, D.E. (2010), Comity as Conflict: Resituating International Comity as Conflict of Laws, în UC Davis Law Review, vol. 44, p. 11-79.

Cuniberti G. (2022), Conflict of Laws. A Comparative Approach. Text and Cases, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (UK)-Northampton, MA (USA).

Currie B. (1959), Notes on Methods and Objectives in the Conflict of Laws, Duke Law Journal, nr. 2 p. 171-181.

Ferrari F., Arroyo D.P.F. (eds.) (2019), Private International Law. Contemporary Challenges and Continuing Relevance, Edward Elgar Publishing, Elgar Monographs in Private International Law, Cheltenham (UK)- Northampton (MA, USA).

Gaillard E. (2010), Legal Theory of International Arbitration, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Gannagé L. (2013), Les méthodes du droit international privé à l’épreuve des conflits de cultures, Martinus Nijhoff, Haga.

Goode R. (2018), The Development of Transnational Commercial Law, Oxford University Press.

Gottschalk E., Michaels R., Rühl G., von Hein J. (eds.) (2007), Conflicts of Laws in a Globalized World, Cambridge University Press.

Hojnik J. (2013), Country-of-Origin and Mutual Recognition Principles – Vehicles for Regulating Market in a Multi-Level-Governance System(March 22, 2013), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2237875

Jessup Ph. C. (2020), Drept transnaţional (traducere efectuată de Bobei R.B.), Editura Universul Juridic, Bucureşti.

Juvara A. (1934), Curs de drept internaţional privat (Conflictele de legi), Tipografia şi Legătoria Penitenciarului „Văcăreşti”, Bucureşti.

Koh H.H. (1997), Why Do Nations Obey International Law?, The Yale Law Journal, vol. 106, nr. 8, p. 2599-2659.

Koskenniemi M. (2006), Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law,Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, documentul nr.A/CN.4/L.682, sesiunea nr. 58, Geneva, 1 mai – 9 iunie şi 3 iulie -11 august 2006.

Krisch N. (ed.) (2022), Entangled Legalities beyond the State, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, Global Law Series.

Lorenzen E.G. (1918-1919), Huber’s De Conflictu Legum, inclusiv Appendix, în Illinois Law Review, volumul 13, p. 374-418.

Lhuilier G. (2016), Le droit transnational, Dalloz, Paris.

Michaels R. (2006), EU Law as Private International Law? Reconceptualizing the Country-of-Origin Principle as Vested-Rights Theory, Journal of Private International Law, vol.2, nr. 2, p.195-242 https://doi.org/10.1080/17536235.2006.11424307.

Michaels R. (2008), Public and Private International Law: German Views on Global Issues, Journal of Private International Law, nr. 4, p.121-138, https://doi.org/10.1080/17536235.2008.11424336.

Michaels R., Jansen N. (2006), Private Law Beyond the State? Europenization, Globalization and Privatization, The American Journal of Comparative Law, vol.54, nr. 4, disponibil la https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/1612.

Michaels R. (2016), State Law as a Transnational Legal Order, UC Irvine Journal of International, Transnational and Comparative Law, vol.1, p. 141-160, disponibil la: https://scholarship.law.uci.edu/ucijil/vol1/iss1/7.

Michaels R. (2017), Towards a Private International Law for Regulatory Conflicts?, în Japanese Yearbook of International Law, vol.59, p. 175-201.

Mills A. (2006), The Private History of International Law, în Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol. 55, p. 1-50, DOI:10.1093/iclq/lei066.

Nafziger J.A.R., Symeonides S. (eds.) (2002), Law and Justice in a Multistate World. Essayls in honor of Arthur T. von Mehren, Ardsley New York, Transnational Publishers.

Paul J.R. (2008), The Transformation of International Comity, în Law and Contemporary Problems, vol. 71, p. 19-38.

Paul J.R. (1991), Comity in International Law, în Harvard International Law Journal, vol.32, nr. 1, p. 1-79.

Paul J.R. (1988), The Isolation of Private International Law, în Wisconsin International Law Journal, vol.7, nr. 1 p. 149-178.

Rabel E. (1945), The Conflict of Laws: A Comparative Study. Volume One. Introduction: Family Law, Chicago, Callaghan & Company.

Radu I. (1943), „Dreptul internaţional privat transitoriu. Principiul actualităţii normelor de conflict”, Editura Universităţii „Regele Ferdinand I” din Cluj-Sibiu, 1943.

Rasmussen-Bonne H.-E., Freer R., Luke W., Weitnauer W. (eds.) (2005), Balancing of Interests: Liber Amicorum Peter Hay zum 70.Geburtstag,Recht und Wirtschaft GmbH, Frankfurt am Main.

Reimann M. (2004), From the Law of Nations to Transnational Law: Why We Need a New Basic Course for the International Curriculum, în Pennsylvania State International Law Review, vol. 22, nr. 3, p. 397-415.

Rühl G. (2006), Methods and Approaches in Choice of Law: An Economic Perspective, Berkeley Journal of International Law, vol. 24, nr. 3, p. 801-831, DOI: 10.15779/Z38J35R.

Schultz Th., Ridi, N. (2018), Comity: The American Development of a Transnational Concept, în Yearbook of Private International Law, volume 18 (2016/2017), p. 211-244.

Shapiro M. (1994), The Globalization of Law, în Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, nr. 1 p. 37-64.

Snyder F., Lu Y.(eds.) (2015), The Future of Transnational Law/L’avenir du droit transnational. UE, USA, Chine et les BRICS/EU, USA, China and the BRICS, Bruylant, Bruxelles.

Stolleis M., Streeck W. (eds.) (2007), Aktuelle Fragen zu politischer und rechtlicher Steuerung im Kontext der Globalisierung, Nomos.

Teubner G. (2012), Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism in Globalization(traducere efectuată de Norbury G.), Oxford University Press, 2012.

Yntema H.E. (1953), The Historic Bases of Private International Law, în The American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 2, nr. 3, p. 297-317.

Yntema H.E. (1957), The Objectives of Private International Law, The Canadian Bar Review, vol.35, nr. 6, p.721-742.

Yntema H.E. (1966), The Comity Doctrine, în Michigan Law Review, vol. 65, nr. 1, p.9-32.

Vagts D.F., Dodge W.S., Buxbaum H.L., Koh H.H (2019), Transnational Business Problems, ediţia a VI-a, West Academic.

Walzer M. (1984), Liberalism and the Art of Separation, Political Theory, vol. 2, nr. 3.

Watt H.M. (2019), Discours sur les méthodes du droit international privé (des formes juridiques de l’inter-altérité). Cours général de drpot international privé, Brill – Nijhoff, Haga.

Watt H.M., Arroyo D.P.F. (eds.) (2014), Private International Law and Global Governance, Oxford University Press.

Whytock C.A. (2016), Conflict of laws, Global Governance and Transnational Legal Order, în UC Irvine Journal of International, Transnational and Comparative Law, vol. 1, p. 117-140, disponibil la: https://scholarship.law.uci.edu/ucijil/vol1/iss1/6.

Zumbansen P. (ed.) (2020), The Many Lives of Transnational Law. Critical Engagements with Jessup’s Bold Proposal, Cambridge University Press.

Zumbansen P. (ed.) (2021), The Oxford Handbook of Transnational Law, Oxford University Press, 2021.