romanian english

Elnur Karimov: Are the ICSID Arbitration Clauses in Investment Contracts Concluded via Smart Contracts Valid?

DOI: http://doi.org/10.47743/jss-2022-68-3-23

Abstract: Blockchain technology gained popularity with the emergence of intellectual technologies, as cryptocurrencies are also being discussed within contract law along with the interpretation of the concept of consent, and the validity of the consent written in computer codes. This article discusses the validity of arbitration clauses included in smart contracts in the light of the ICSID arbitration, decisions of tribunals and argues that although the institutional arbitration centres such as the ICSID do not possess required technical capacity, taking into account the level of flexibility of the condition of “consent in writing” interpreted in ICSID tribunal decisions on the jurisdiction, a valid arbitration agreement can be concluded in the form of smart contracts encoded and self-executed. Besides, revisiting ICSID model clauses, this paper has suggested a new model arbitration clause adaptable to smart contracts.

Keywords: blockchain, smart contracts, ICSID arbitration, arbitration clause, validity

References

Akca Sefa, Ajitha Rajan and Chao Peng. „SIF: A Framework for Solidity Contract Instrumentation and Analysis”. https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC48747.2019.00071

Akıncı, Ziya. Milletlerarası Tahkim [International Arbitration]. Ed. 3. Vedat. Istanbul, Turkey. 2013

Akyüz, Şule. The Jurisdiction of ICSID: The Application of the Article 25 of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Law. vol. 52. nr. 3/2003. pp. 333‑362. https://doi.org/10.1501/Hukfak_0000000523

Alexander, Roman. Das Ethereum Handbuch: Eine Anleitung in das Investieren, Anlegen und Programmieren der Blockchain‑Technologie [The Ethereum Handbook: A Guide to Investing, Creating and Programming Blockchain Technology]. vol. 1. Via Tolino Media. 2017

Amro, Ihab. Online Arbitration in Theory and Practice: A Comparative Study of Cross‑border Commercial Transactions in Common Law and Civil Law Countries. Cambridge Scholars. 2019. https://doi.org/10.5553/ijodr/235250022020007002005

Ataman‑Figanmeşe, İnci. Manufacturing Consent to Investment Treaty Arbitration by Means of the Notion of ‘Arbitration without Privity’. Annales de la Faculte de Droit d’Istanbul. vol. 43. nr. 60/2011. pp. 187‑201

Atkinson, Susan, and Gabrielle Benefield. „Software Development: Why the Traditional Contract Model is not Fit for Purpose”. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2013.492

Badiei, Farzaneh. „Online Arbitration Definition and Its Distinctive Features”. [Online]

Ben Ayed, Ahmed. A Conceptual Secure Blockchain‑based Electronic Voting System. International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications. vol. 9, nr. 3/2017. pp. 1‑9. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijnsa.2017.9301

Bodo, Balazs, Daniel Gervais, and Joao Pedro Quintais. Blockchain and Smart Contracts: The Missing Link in Copyright Licensing?. International Journal of Law and Information Technology. vol. 26. nr. 4/2018. pp. 311‑336. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eay014.

Budak, Aslı, and Seher Elif Köse. „Turkey: Arbitration in the Era of Smart Contracts”. [Online]

Bulut, Rumeysa, Alperen Kantarcı, Safa Keskin, and Şerif Bahtiyar. „Blockchain‑based Electronic Voting System for Elections in Turkey”. https://doi.org/10.1109/ubmk.2019.8907102.

Christidis, Konstantinos and Michael Devetsikiotis. Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access. vol. 4. nr. 1/2016. pp. 2292‑2303. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2016.2566339.

Clack, Christopher D., Vikram A. Bakshi, and Lee Braine. „Smart Contract Templates: Foundations, Design Landscape and Research Directions”. [Online]

Cole, Tony. The Structure of Investment Arbitration. Routledge. 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203758755.

Çal, Sedat. Uluslararası Yatırım Tahkimine Yönelik Kimi Eleştirilerin Değerlendirilmesi [Discussion of Some Criticism about International Investment Arbitration]. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. vol. 57. nr. 4/2008. pp. 135‑190. https://doi.org/10.1501/hukfak_0000001550

Eenmaa‑Dimitrieva, Helen, and Maria Jose Schmidt‑Kessen. Smart Contracts: Reducing Risks in Economic Exchange with No‑Party Trust?. European Journal of Risk Regulation. vol. 10. nr. 2/2019. pp. 245‑262. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2019.37

Erkan, Mustafa. Tahkim Şartının Ayrılabilirliği Prensibinin Asıl Sözleşmenin Yokluğu Durumunda Değerlendirilmesi [Discussing the Principle of Separability of the Arbitration Clause in the Nullity of the Main Agreement]. Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. vol. 17. nr. 1‑2/2013. pp. 535‑562.

Eyuboğlu, Ceren. Türk Hukukunda Tahkim Anlaşmasının Geçerliliği [The Validity of the Arbitration Agreements in Turkish Law]. Ankara Barosu Dergisi. vol. 75. nr. 3/2017. pp. 227‑241. https://doi.org/10.30915/abd.463759

Fouret, Julien, Rémy Gerbay, Gloria M. Alvarez, and Denis Parchajev (eds.). The ICSID Convention, Regulations and Rules: A Practical Commentary. Edward Elgar Publishing. 2019. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786435248.

Gaillard, Emmanuel. Some Notes on the Drafting of ICSID Arbitration Clauses. ICSID Review. vol. 3. nr. 1/1988. 136‑146. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/3.1.136.

Gurkaynak, Gonenc, İlay Yılmaz, Burak Yeşilaltay, and Berk Bengi. Intellectual Property Law and Practice in the Blockchain Realm. Computer Law and Security Review. vol. 34. nr. 4/2018. pp. 847‑862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.05.027.

Herian, Robert. „Legal Recognition of Blockchain Registries and Smart Contracts”. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12449.86886/1.

Hsiao, Jerry. ‘Smart Contract’ on the Blockchain Paradigm Shift for Contract Law?. US‑China Law Review. vol. 14. nr. 10/2017. pp. 685‑694. https://doi.org/10.17265/1548‑6605/2017.10.002.

Hu, Yining, Madhusanka Liyanage, Ahsan Mansoor, Kanchana Thilakarathna, Guillaume Jourjon, and Aruna Seneviratne. „Blockchain‑based Smart Contracts Applications and Challenges”. [Online]

International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. „Dispute Settlement: Consent to Arbitration”. [Online]

Junis, Fengkie, Faisal Malik Widya Prasetya, Farouq Ibrahim Lubay, and Anny Kartika Sari. „A Revisit on Blockchain‑based Smart Contract Technology”. [Online]

Karamanlıoğlu, Argun. Concept of Smart Contracts: A Legal Perspective. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. nr. 35/2018. pp. 29‑42.

Kasprzyk, Karolina. The Concept of Smart Contracts from the Legal Perspective. Review of European and Comparative Law. vol. 34. nr. 3/2018. pp. 101‑118. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.4514

Levy, Karen E. C. Book‑smart, Not Street‑smart: Blockchain‑based Smart Contracts and the Social Workings of Law. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society. vol. 3. nr. 2/2017. pp. 1‑15. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2017.107

Luu, Loi, Duc‑Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena, and Aquinas Hobor. „Making Smart Contracts Smarter”. https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2978309

Maxwell, Winston and Gauthier Vannieuwenhuyse. Robots Replacing Arbitrators: Smart Contract Arbitration. ICC Dispute Resolution Bulletin. vol. 1. nr. 1/2018. pp. 24‑33

Milk, Eliza. Smart Contracts: Terminology, Technical Limitations and Real World Complexity. Journal of Law, Innovation and Technology. vol. 9. nr. 2/2017

Nandar Aung, Yu and Thitinan Tanditham, „Ethereum‑based Emergency Service for Smart Home System: Smart Contract Implementation”, https://doi.org/ 10.23919/icact.2019.8701987

Ortalani, Pietro. The Impact of Blockchain Technologies and Smart Contracts on Dispute Resolution: Arbitration and Court Litigation at the Crossroads. Uniform Law Review. vol. 24. nr. 2/2019. pp. 430‑448

Paleviciene (Cirtautiene), Solveiga. Consent to Arbitration and the Legacy of the SPP v. Egypt Case. Baltic Journal of Law and Politics. vol. 7. nr. 1/2014. pp. 149‑162. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp‑2014‑0009

Paparinskis, Martins. Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures. British Yearbook of International Law. vol. 79. nr. 1/2008. pp. 264‑352. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1152338

Paulsson, Jan. Arbitration without Privity. ICSID Review. vol. 10. nr. 2/1995. pp. 232‑257. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/10.2.232

Reinisch, August. Enforcement of Investment Awards, in Katia Yanacca‑Small (ed.). Arbitration under International Investment Agreements: A Guide to the Key Issues. Oxford University Press. 2010. pp. 671‑699. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198758082.003.0029

Rohr, Jonathan G. Smart Contracts and Traditional Contract Law, or: The Law of Vending Machine. In Cleveland State Law Review. vol. 67. nr. 1/2019. pp. 71‑92

Savelyev, Alexander. Contract Law 2.0: Smart Contracts as the Beginning of the End of Classic Contract Law. Journal of Information & Communications Technology Law. vol. 26. nr. 2/2017. pp. 116‑134. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2885241

Schmitz, Amy J., and Colin Rule. Online Dispute Resolution for Smart Contracts. Journal of Dispute Resolution. vol. 2. nr. 1/2019. pp. 103‑125

Schreuer, Christoph H. Consent to Arbitration. In Peter Muchlinski, Federico Ortino and Christoph H. Schreuer (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law. Oxford University Press. 2008. pp. 830‑867. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199231386.013.0021

Schreuer, Christoph H. Denunciation of the ICSID Convention and Consent to Arbitration, in Michael Waibel, Asha Kaushal, Kyo‑Hwa Chung, and Claire Balchin (eds.). The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality. Wolters Kluwer. 2010. pp. 353‑368

Schreuer, Christoph H. The ICSID Convention: A Commentary. Cambridge. 2001

Shehata, Ibrahim. „Smart Contracts & International Arbitration”. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3290026

Sklaroff, Jeremy M. Smart Contracts and the Cost of Inflexibility. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. vol. 166. nr. 1/2017. pp. 264‑303

Szabo, Nick. „Smart Contracts: Building Blocks for Digital Markets”. [Online]

Şanlı, Cemal. Uluslararası Ticari Akitlerin Hazırlanması ve Uyuşmazlıkların Çözüm Yolları [Drafting International Trade Treaties and Dispute Resolution Mechanisms]. 5th ed., Beta Publishing. 2013

Tahyar, Benjamin H. Confidentiality in ICSID Arbitration after AMCO Asia Corp. v. Indonesia: Watchword or White Elephant?. Fordham International Law Journal. vol. 10. nr. 1/1986. pp. 93‑122

Tank, Margo, David Whitaker, and Patricia Fry. „Smart Contracts, Blockchain and Commercial Law”. [Online] at hhttps://bit.ly/3ifwH8U. accessed on 12/01/2020

Voutos, Yorghos, Georgios Drakopoulos, and Phivos Mylonas. „Smart Agriculture: An Open Field for Smart Contracts”. https://doi.org/10.1109/seeda‑cecnsm.2019.8908411

Wang, Qiping, Raymond Yiu Keung Lau, and Xudong Mao. „Blockchain‑Enabled Smart Contracts for Enhancing Distributor‑to‑Consumer Transactions”. https://doi.org/10.1109/mce.2019.2941346

Winkler, Matteo M. Arbitration without Privity and Russian Oil: The Yukos Case before the Houston Court. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. vol. 27. nr. 1/2006. pp. 115‑153

Woebbeking, Maren K. The Impact of Smart Contracts on Traditional Concepts of Contract Law, Journal of Intellectual Property. Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law. vol. 10. nr. 1/2019. pp. 105‑112

Yavuz, Melih Sefa. Ekonomide Dijital Dönüşüm: Blockchain Teknolojisi ve Uygulama Alanları Üzerinde Bir İnceleme [Digital Revolution in Economy: A Study on the Blockchain Technology and Its Areas of Application]. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. vol. 4. nr. 1/2019. pp. 15‑29. https://doi.org/10.29106/fesa.498053

Zhang, Fan, Ethan Cecchetti, Kyle Croman, Ari Juels, and Elaine Shi. „Town Crier: An Authenticated Data Feed for Smart Contracts”. https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2978326

Zheng, Zibin, Shaoan Xie, Hongning Dai, Xiangping Chen, and Huaimin Wang. „An Overview of Blockchain Technology: Architecture, Consensus, and Future Trends”. https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdatacongress.2017.85



Facultatea de Drept
.

B-dul Carol I nr. 11, cod 700506, IAŞI
Secretariat cursuri IF:
+40 232 201058
+40 232 201158
Fax: +40 232 201858
Secretariat cursuri IFR:
+40 232 201272
Fax: +40 232 201872


Copyright Facultatea de Drept, IAŞI , 2022
Server-ul a generat răspunsul în 0.0819 sec.
292087348