romanian english

Andreea Luciana Urzică: A plea for bias awareness in processing and interpretation of evidence provided by witnesses. Psychology on the stand

DOI: 10.47743/jss-2022-68-4-15

Abstract: Since the U.S. Academy of Science released an extensive report regarding the necessity of strengthening forensic science (2009), a great deal of attention was devoted to finding better ways to analyze and making sense of any gathered as a result of criminal investigations. Whether we have considered the analysis of forensic evidence colected from the crime scene or testimonial evidence, they go through a process that is prone to inherent subjective interpretation and unintentional cognitive errors. This article starts from the premise that the knowledge about science‑based principles in psychology could significantly contribute to the improvement of decision‑making processes and legal practices. In this regard, we choose to formulate a plea in order to present on the one hand some of the cognitive errors that occur in the interpretation of the evidence provided by witnesses and, on the other hand, to indicate three directions of action that could reduce this problem. The three convergent solutions focus on: a) the transfer of methodological know‑how regarding data reliability (from psychology field) on forensic evidence's reliability (in criminal investigation); b) the transfer of knowledge about cognitive biases that could emerge from witness‑investigators interaction, to increase the awareness of these risks; c) transfer of information regarding a series of concrete psychological interventions that could redesign the architecture of an investigation in order to reduce cognitive biases using scientifically validated procedures relatively easy to apply and cost‑effective.

Keywords: witness testimony, reliability of evidence, scientifically validated procedures, cognitive errors

References

Attard J. & Bindemann M., Establishing the duration of crimes: An individual differences and eye‐tracking investigation into time estimation, în Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 2014, pp. 215‑225, DOI:10.1002/acp.2986, [Online]

Bull R., Cooke C., Hatcher R. & Woodhams J., Criminal Psychology: A Beginner's Guide, Oneworld Publications Limited, 2006

Clifford B. R. & Bull R., The Psychology of Person Identification, Routledge, London, 1978

Gabbert F., Hope L., Fisher R. P. & Jamieson K., Protecting against misleading postevent information with a self‑administered interview, în Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(4), 2012, pp. 568‑575, https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2828 , [Online]

Groza G., Psihologie aplicată în procesul penal, Editura Universul Juridic, Bucureşti, 2019

Howitt D., Introduction to forensic and criminal psychology (6th edition), Harlow: Pearson Education, 2018

Lindsay R. C. L., Semmler C., Weber N., Brewer N. & Lindsay M. R., How variations in distance affect eyewitness reports and identification accuracy, în Law and Human Behavior, 32(6), 2008, pp. 526‑535, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979‑008‑9128‑x , [Online]

Loftus E. F., Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30‑year investigation of the malleability of memory, în Learning & Memory, 12(4), 2005, pp. 361–366, https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705 , [Online]

Loftus E. F., Leading questions and the eyewitness report, în Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 1975, pp. 560‑572, https://doi.org/10.1016/0010‑0285(75)90023‑7, [Online]

Loftus E. F., When a lie becomes memory's truth: Memory distortion after exposure to misinformation, în Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(4), 1992, pp. 121‑123, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467‑8721.ep10769035 , [Online]

Loftus E. F. & Palmer J. C., Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory, în Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 1974, pp. 585‑589, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022‑5371(74)80011‑3, [Online]

Loftus E. F. & Zanni G., Eyewitness testimony: The influence of the wording of a question, în Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5(1), 1975, pp. 86–88, https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336715 , [Online]

Magnussen S., Wise R. A., Raja A. Q., Safer M. A., Pawlenko N., Stridbeck U., What judges know about eyewitness testimony: A comparison of Norwegian and US judges, în Psychology, în Crime & Law, 14:3, 2008, pp. 177 – 188, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/10683160701580099 , [Online]

National Research Council (U.S.), Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C, 2009

Pansky A., Koriat A. & Goldsmith M., Eyewitness recall and testimony, în N. Brewer & K. D. Williams (eds.), Psychology and Law: An Empirical Perspective, New York: Guilford, 2005, pp. 93–150

Roediger H. L. & McDermott K. B., Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists, în Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 1995, pp. 803‑ 814, DOI: 10.1037/0278‑7393.21.4.803, [Online]

Ross D. R., Ceci S. J., Dunning, D. & Toglia, M. P., Unconscious transference and mistaken identity: When a witness misidentifies a familiar but innocent person, în Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 1994, pp. 918–930, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021‑9010.79.6.918, [Online]

Shepherd, J. W., Identification after long delays, în S. M. A. Lloyd‑Bostock & B. R. Clifford (eds.), Evaluating Witness Evidence, Chichester Wiley, 1983, pp. 173‑187

Thompson W. B., Eyewitness memory: A field study of viewing angle, pose, and eyewitness age, în Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 14(2), 2018, pp. 102–119, DOI: 2019‑27390‑002, [Online]

Turtle J., Lindsay R. C. L. & Wells G. L., Best practice recommendations for eyewitness evidence procedures: New ideas for the oldest way to solve a case, în Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services, 1(1), 2003, pp. 5‑18

Valentine T., Pickering A. & Darling, S., Characteristics of eyewitness identification that predict the outcome of real lineups, în Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 17(8), 2003, pp. 969‑993, https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.939, [Online]

Van Koppen P. J. & Lochun S. K., Portraying perpetrators; the validity of offender descriptions by witnesses, în Law and Human Behavior, 21(6), 1997, pp. 661‑685, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024812831576, [Online]

VandenBos, G. R., APA dictionary of psychology, American Psychological Association, 2007

Wells G. L., Applied eyewitness‑testimony research: System variables and estimator variables, în Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(12), 1978, pp. 1546‑1557, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022‑3514.36.12.1546, [Online]

Wise R. A. & Safer M. A., What US judges know and believe about eyewitness testimony, în Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 18(4), 2004, pp 427‑443, https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.993, [Online]

Yarmey A. D., The Psychology of Eyewitness Testimony, New York Free Press, 1979

***DNA Exonerations in the United States (n.d.), Innocence Project, [Online]


Faculty of Law
.

B-dul Carol I nr. 11, cod 700506, IAŞI
Secretariat full-time learning:
+40 232 201058
+40 232 201158
Fax: +40 232 201858
Secretariat distance learning:
+40 232 201272
Fax: +40 232 201872


Copyright Faculty of Law, IAŞI , 2024
The server generated the answer in 0.0927 sec.
292087348